Random thoughts: Blade vs. electric shavers
Random thoughts is my attempt to blog more. I often have many ideas and thoughts going through my brain but don’t write about it cause it didn’t relate to tech or I didn’t feel it was worthy. As such, random thoughts is an excuse for a brain dump.
I bought an electric shaver around 3 years ago, tired of constantly going through new blades. At the time I thought an electric shaver would be a quicker easier option to shave, being able to quickly have a dry shave in my room in the mornings before work. The trade-off being that it wouldn’t be as smooth of a shave as using a blade but I was willing to accept that. Interestingly, my ideas of the electric shaver were completely off on both counts.
I find that getting a complete shave from an electric shaver compared to a blade takes at least twice as long to achieve, probably averaging around 20 mins. This is due to the electric shaver not picking up some hairs during the first run, meaning I have to go over them a couple of times before they get caught in the foil. So with my idea of switching to an electric shaver for convenience shattered, does it mean my costly investment in one was a complete waste: not in the slightest.
What I also didn’t expect is that while the electric shaver took longer to complete, it also resulted in a much smoother shave compared to a blade. This is completely contrary to what many others who have used both had told me but to this day if I want the smoothest shave, I’ll grab the electric every time.
While I still have a blade available just in case where I need a quick shave or forgot to charge my electric shaver, I still use the electric the majority of the time.
Facebook gouging Australian customers for purchases as well
In an effort to find more ways to monetize the site, Facebook recently introduced the ability to pay for a story to be highlighted in your friends news feeds. I'm not too sure why you would want to pay for this feature, however the merits of the highlight system isn't in question here. The price between users globally is.
In the USA, this fee is $2 USD per post you want to highlight. I just happened to notice a highlight button when I posted some photos recently and checked it out. I was stunned to notice that Australians are forced to pay $7.70 AUD for the privilege!
While the Australian dollar has recently dipped below parity compared to the US dollar, $1 AUD currently equals $0.97 USD. According to Facebook however, one Australian dollar should be the equivalent of $0.26 USD.
Australians have been, and continue to be, on the wrong end of product cost conversion for years but it has recently come to light just how much we are getting ripped off; particularly for digital goods.
ZDNet (http://www.zdnet.com.au/australians-to-pay-more-for-adobe-cs6-339336463.htm) uncovered one of the worst offenders, Adobe, and discovered Australians pay up to $1350 more than our US counterparts for the CS6 Master Collection; $3929 AUD compared to $2599 USD. This would still value the AUD higher than Facebook does at $0.66 USD.
There really is no genuinely good reason for this practice. Maybe iTunes has some reason for their price differences because of the different agreements they would have with local music companies, but there is no cost difference for Adobe and Facebook to provide these services and products to customers here compared to the US. The hope of the internet economy was to remove the regional differences, not exaggerate them.